Theatre Record

 

This Edition

 

Issue 11 - 2004

Prompt Corner Click to enlarge

All right; I was wrong.  Now can it stop, please?  The succession of rapid West End closures claimed Rattle Of A Simple Man just after the last issue of Theatre Record went to press.  This issue it's Fuddy Meers which has bowed out, just under three weeks after its press night.  Even Thoroughly Modern Millie is to bring down its final curtain towards the end of June.  For once it looks as if the annual early-silly-season stories of Theatreland crisis are more than just crying wolf.  Or are they?  Leaving aside Millie (which has enjoyed a respectable eight-month run), then as I've already remarked, none of these blink-and-you-miss-them productions are crippling losses to the cultural life of the capital.  Some only arrived when they did, or at all, due to misplaced opportunism when a theatre became suddenly dark after an earlier unexpected closure.  We need not grieve overly about any of them.

Cruddy sneers

Except Fuddy Meers.  I'm astounded by the critical mauling given to David Lindsay-Abaire's deceptively thoughtful play.  Only Sheridan Morley in the Express and Victoria Segal in the Sunday Times seemed to have a good word for it, and neither of them quite put their finger on what for me was its strength.  For the rest of the pack, it was a matter of cruddy sneers.  They saw it as an unsuccessful comedy.  (And by the way, if the gag of "fuddy meers" being aphasic stroke-speak for "funny mirrors" is so limp, why do at least half a dozen reviews recycle it with a comment about the play not being fuddy?  It doesn't become any fuddier just because it's one of us saying it.)  On the contrary, I'd argue that in some ways it was too successful for its own good.

Lindsay-Abaire seems to me to have used a classic bait-and-switch strategy: set up a particular tone and emotional register in the first act, then subvert it radically in the second.  The keynote of his second act is not the encroaching sentiment (which there's nothing wrong with, in any case, if deployed properly).  Nor is he simply saying, ah, we're all of us a bit odd, aren't we?  Go back to that title.  The funny mirrors in a carnival sideshow aren't just funny ha-ha: the images they reflect can alternate between, and sometimes be simultaneously, amusing and sinister, even frightening.  Every secret revealed in the play's second act is a dark one; rather than fuelling sympathy and driving the play towards sentimentality, they remove compassion even as they force us to identify with the characters by showing us that everyone, the audience as well as the figures onstage, harbours unpleasantnesses... and that everyone, not just the stroke-stricken mother in the play, sometimes speaks skew-whiff to reality and/or hard for others to understand.

Wrong-footed

Look in the reviews for any of this, and you'll look in vain.  It's possible, I suppose, that everyone noticed but no-one thought it worth mentioning (apart from Victoria, obliquely).  But it doesn't feel that way; it feels as if everyone had suddenly become Toby Young and left at the interval.  Fair enough, the humour in the first act was patchy and often laboured, and that might discourage one from paying attention through the second half.  But damn it, it's our job.  I remember years ago getting an iffy review of a book I'd written from someone who had evidently read the first 60 or so pages and extrapolated from there.  What rankled wasn't that it was slighting to me or lazy of the reviewer, but that it was just unprofessional.

I know that sounds unbelievably priggish, and I'm sorry to come on so sanctimonious.  God knows, it's impossible to stay engaged through every moment of every show, and in that respect I'm no better than the next man (unless the next man is the aforementioned Mr Young).  And, in its way, wandering attention is a valid critical response.  But there's always that risk of being wrong-footed, and I think the case of Fuddy Meers shows an entire critical chorus-line caught on the hop.  Which is a pity, because if a few people had remarked upon what was only half-hidden in there, it might just have run for a few more weeks and thus prevented the headline-hungry hacks in the front pages from playing the old set-'em-up, knock-'em-down game with Sam Mendes and his new production outfit Scamp.

Simulacrum of culture

Of course, the problems with castigating reviewers for not doing their job in this respect, i.e. spotting what plays are about and telling people, are manifold.  Quite apart from fashioning a rod for my own back, there's the fact that, increasingly, editors don't see that as part of our brief. or don't care about it. or consider it a downright distraction from the business of providing an entertaining simulacrum of culture.  The notion of offering a paper's readers consistent, reliable, informed and informative writing on theatre is going out of fashion, and not just at the red-top end of the press.  Having ousted the estimable Michael Coveney, the Daily Mail now seems to be partly holding live auditions for possible replacements, partly seeing how much or how little serious theatre coverage it can get away with.  One week of the able and of late underused Patrick Marmion; a week of classical and opera reviewer David Gillard getting to grips with crossing the tracks; a week of actor Nichola McAuliffe being articulate and inquisitive but essentially looking through the wrong end of the telescope; another week of Patrick, though a week that consisted of little more than the Friday round-up rather than daily coverage... and so on.  The honeymoon between Sheridan Morley and the Express seems to be over, too, as his First Night review spot loses prominence in favour of a Backstage news-and-gossip column, and even that now appears squeezed.  You can almost see the middle-manager sitting there, calculating how little coverage a title can get away with before it hurts either circulation or reputation seriously, or how much effect a "name" reviewer such as Sheridan or Ms McAuliffe has.  (Although, as Sherry himself notes, the big-name successors on two of his former gigs lasted scarcely any time at all: Toby Young's off after barely a year at the Spectator - and what a joy it is to see an actual theatre reviewer, Rachel Halliburton, engaged to (half?) replace him - and Michael Portillo toughed it out for only a few months at the New Statesman, not even long enough for Theatre Record to secure consent to reprint his reviews.)

Accident of chronology

All of which self-regarding pomposity on my part leaves little space for a whistle-stop tour of shows seen in this fortnight and not already reviewed by me in the body of the issue.  The Black Rider, to begin with.  It was a show that I felt I should be downright loving rather than merely liking a great deal, and it didn't quite succeed in that.  I wonder how much of this is an accident of chronology. The Black Rider came to the Barbican a year after a similar revival of the Robert Wilson/Tom Waits collaboration on Woyzeck, with the risk that it might appear to be coming hard on the heels of that earlier work and ploughing substantially the same furrow: 19th-century German oddity given a sumptuously Expressionist look by Wilson and a Weill-esque sound by Waits. In fact, however, in terms of composition and première, Woyzeck is the later show by fully a decade: 1990/2000.

In any case, the production had its delights: not just the mere appearance of Marianne Faithfull, playing the infernal Pegleg as a portly Cabaret Emcee, but also soi-disant punk/New Romantic cult figure Richard Strange looming in a crazily-angled frame and Mary Margaret O'Hara singing her wonderful Act Two solo like a nightingale with the non-expletive form of Tourette's, all sudden growls, yelps and whoops.  The second act itself, though, is largely shapeless, consisting of a great central set-piece scene with several preludes and several codas.  Much of the energy and excitement in this phase came from the all-star band, The Magic Bullets, assembled by musical director Bent Clausen.  Important enough in their own right for the Guardian to have sent its rock critic Alexis Petridis to review the show as well as Michael Billington, Clausen and his combo brewed up several storms, cutting loose and playing around the score rather than being a well-behaved pit band and following the dots on the paper in front of them.  They blew... in the jazz sense rather than that of Bart Simpson.

Altogether some achievement

Measure For Measure is a comparable feat by Simon McBurney. He grasps the problematic nature of the play and embraces it; he sees and acknowledges the potential for up-to-the-minute relevance without seeming to plonk such allusions down coarsely on top of the piece; he uses multimedia elements to rich visual and significatory effect rather than for modish purposes; and, despite all the shadows, still shows that it was actually written as a comedy, getting laughs out of hitherto tired pieces of Shakespearean zany even as he also turns them to his sombre purpose.  All this on the less-than-opulent budget of a production in the Olivier's Travelex £10 season.  That's altogether some achievement.

Compare the slight pointlessness of the all-female casting of the Globe's Much Ado About Nothing and the downright tiresome circus whoop-de-do of Gale Edwards' Chichester Midsummer Night's Dream.  Yolanda Vazquez is a first-rate Beatrice at the Globe, the more so for not allowing the character to seem too unevenly matched with Josie Lawrence's effortful, largely undistinguished Benedick.  Penelope Beaumont is far and away the finest of the "breeches" actors as Leonato.  Otherwise, Tamara Harvey's production mimbles along jovially enough, but without either the historical basis of the Globe's all-male offerings in previous years or any palpable insights of its own.  As for the Chichester Dream, well, I'd hoped never to see another production of this play with the fairies clad in blue hair and mismatched Dayglo tights even from a student company, never mind in a major producing house.  If you want to make your Athenian wood out of a clutch of large metal hoops suitable for gymnastics and aerialism, fine, but please don't give it that self-conscious alt.circus veneer which keeps us too busy being irritated by your attitude to follow your reading of the story.

Downright filthy

Out Of This World is much more agreeable fare.  Not only does it have a perfectly serviceable clutch of songs by Cole Porter's standards (and thus enviable by almost everyone else's), but the book which let the show down on its 1950 opening has been thoroughly overhauled, taking elements from its pre-production drafts, from a 1979 rewrite and from Jeremy Sams' contemporary playfulness.  Not to mince words, it's downright filthy, and delightfully so; moreover, it's given the kind of energetically wacky treatment that director Martin Duncan is so adroit at, and which works a treat when, as here, it's justified.

A quick mention, too, for Liberace's Suit: it's hard to go wrong with a courtroom drama, even one in which the judge and counsel sing "I'll Be Seeing You (In All The Old Familiar Places)".  And while it's a pleasant surprise to see that pianist Bobby Crush can act passably well, it's frankly disturbing to find that he can simper every bit as relentlessly as his erstwhile role model...

Ian Shuttleworth

Back to top

At the Back

Can You Hear Me, FIRT ?

The International Federation for Theatre Research, the organisation formally known as FIRT (the Fédération internationale pour la recherche théâtrale) is becoming less bilingual.  Most of the abstracts for its latest annual conference (held in St Petersburg from 22-27 May) are in English, and the fat book containing them uses English, with a little Russian, on its cover to announce that its theme is The Director In The Theatre World.

FIRT is a remarkable body.  Unlike many other international organisations, it is truly representative of its members.  There are not many more than 500 of them, yet at least half of them arrived in St Petersburg, at their own expense, paying a fee to participate for five days of intensive talks, panels and workshops.  It is also truly international, with members in more than 60 countries.

The emphasis of the conference is very much on work, with half a dozen activities usually on the go at a time, and little opportunity for networking or gossip apart from a closing dinner and a programme of theatre visits.  The newcomer can get the feeling of intruding on a private party, even if this group of friends and colleagues is very welcoming to those bold enough to approach them.

My task in St Petersburg was to explain the role of the International Association of Theatre Critics, as part of a panel with two other international presidents, those of ASSITEJ, the body for young people's theatre, and SIBMAS, which represents libraries and museums.  We were honoured by the presence of FIRT's president, and its vice-president chaired the public session.  This distinguished group was only just outnumbered by the audience - I had taken the precaution of bringing three friends along.

One might excuse this sparse attendance by the fact that in the programme, conference participants had been invited to meet three acronyms, with no mention of who was speaking for them, what they did, or what would be the topic of the interventions.  The truth is that there were many more exciting panels in competition with us.  I might have wondered whether my presence was necessary, but I was able to justify the seven hours spent waiting outside the Russian consulate in London for a visa by the very fruitful private meeting of the four presidents that followed our panel, which should produce valuable co-operation between our organisations in the future.

There was also the experience of the conference itself.  Each day was led by one or two keynote speeches from the great names of theatre research, and some of their contributions were exemplary.  Opening the conference, Herbert Blau was able not only to range over more than half a century in the theatre as director and instructor, but also to offer some frank, almost confessional reflections on what he considered his failure as the first director of Lincoln Center's Vivian Beaumont Theatre.  Erika Fisher-Lichte gave the key image of the director as midwife, urging a cast to push that little bit harder.  Nikolai Pesochinsky made a case for the eccentric genius of Anatoli Vassiliev, portraying him as a successor to Meyerhold.  Maria Shevtsova added to the virtues of her recent study of Lev Dodin with a well-illustrated account of the St Petersburg director's work in opera.  And Dennis Kennedy made an urbane and well structured redefinition of the whole idea of director's theatre, pointing out how its modernist advocates had recruited to the cause a number of great names who were much more eligible for the description actor-manager (including Antoine and even Stanislavski) and suggesting very different, commercially based reasons for the rise of the director than those usually put forward, principally the change from continuing repertory (in the hands of the actors who played it) to one-off, continuous runs (in the hands of the directors who mounted them).

The last two speakers, in particular, gave splendid demonstrations of how well a lecture can be delivered.  Elsewhere in the conference, in some of the panels, there were plenty of examples of how not to lecture: the arrival of video clips, Powerpoint presentation and other technical wonders has not banished the sad stereotype, seen in so many such events, of the speaker who delivers great gobbets of undigested research in a monotone, perhaps in a language over which they do not have full control, never achieving eye contact with their long-suffering audience.

And, oh my dears, the jargon! Let me offer you some of the juicier examples, drawn from the abstracts:

Even the most dedicated conference-goer may well have been tempted to take a turn around St Petersburg instead of seeking further enlightenment from such as these, and the city was at its beautiful best, its astonishing wealth of architectural masterpieces sharply lit in the long Baltic days, or picked out by subtle floodlight as the White Nights draw in.

And of course there were the performances: the city has an abundance of them, in theatres ranging from grand showcases like the Maryinsky and Alexandrinsky (the latter the venue of the conference, with panels meeting in nooks and alcoves all over the building: we were directed to one in the Dante-esque Seventh Circle. ) to the intimacy of Dodin's Maly or the Liteiny.  In these few days I caught up with the Lithuanian Jonas Vaitkus's sprightly (if overlong) adaptation of Bulgakov's The Master And Margarita at the Baltic House, took in a solid Aïda at the Maryinsky, and caught a glimpse of Russian popular theatre in a performance by the Comic Trust company of what they called Antony And Cleopatra.  This turned out to be a boisterous show that owed much more to Carry On Cleo than Shakespeare, in which street theatre techniques and vaudeville gags were boosted beyond what they could bear by spectacular staging effects including plenty of fireworks and a military band.

Enormous talent

At the Alexandrinsky itself, delegates could see a variety of work by its directors, among them Engagement, a fascinating, surprisingly touching variation on a modern play, Dinamo, whose leading characters regularly left its downstage set to join the characters of a Seagull, complete with lake, being played upstage.  There were also performances of Lev Dodin's repertoire, including the Vanya I so admired in Moscow (Issue 7).  By sheer chance I caught Dodin's Elena, Xenia Rappoport, the day after she had repeated the performance that defines that production, in something completely different, as Jocasta in a tremendous three-handed version of Oedipus Rex.  Andrey Prikotenko's version (at the Liteiny) dared to enact the story beforehand in farcical dumbshow (a sort of pre-satyr play) before telling the Sophocles story almost straight, with the principals slipping smoothly into the role of their own chorus to comment on their actions.  Ms Rappoport, who started in both these roles more or less direct from the Academy, is an enormous talent - in the West she would have been snapped up by now for movies and probably lost to theatre.

Ian Herbert

Back to top

Contents / Reviews

London

   

BARBARA COOK'S BROADWAY  Solo musical performance

Gielgud

24 May

29 May

681

THE BLACK RIDER  New musical by Robert Wilson, William Burroughs and Tom Waits

Barbican

21 May

19 Jun

677

COLE  Revival of Benny Green/Alan Strachan musical tribute to Cole Porter

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

26 May

20 Jun

709

DON'T LOOK BACK  New site-specific piece; dreamthinkspeak

Somerset House

28 May

14 Jun

712

THE FALSE SERVANT  Revival of play by Pierre Marivaux, translated by Martin Crimp

Cottesloe

1 Jun

714

FUDDY MEERS  New play by David Lindsay-Abaire

Arts

25 May

12 Jun

688

GUANTANAMO: Honour Bound To Defend Freedom   New play compiled by Victoria Brittain and Gillian Slovo

Tricycle

24 May

12 Jun

683

IZ  New play by Oliver Emanuel

Greenwich Playhouse

20 May

6 Jun

687

JOURNEY'S END  Transfer of R.C. Sherriff revival (from Comedy, p70)

Playhouse

20 May

695

LIBERACE'S SUIT  New play by TK Light

Jermyn Street

27 May

19 Jun

700

MEASURE FOR MEASURE  Revival of the play by Shakespeare

Olivier

27 May

31 Jul

702

MINDBENDER  Return of devised show by Peepolykus

Lyric Studio

20 May

19 Jun

713

MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING  Revival of play by Shakespeare

Shakespeare's Globe

2 Jun

25 Sep

719

THREE BY BECKETT: Ohio Impromptu/Rough For Theatre 1 & 2  Revival of short plays by Samuel Beckett

Southwark Playhouse

31 May

19 Jun

680

PERPETUA  London première of 1996 play by Fraser Grace

Latchmere

20 May

6 Jun

682

PLAY DEAD: People Show 115  Devised by the company

People Show Studios

21 May

23 May

687

THE PRIVATE ROOM  New play by Mark Lee

New End

28 May

26 Jun

710

SIMPATICO  Revival of play by Sam Shepard

White Bear

2 Jun

20 Jun

722

WEEPIE  London première of 1996 play by Chris Goode

Camden People's

20 May

6 Jun

701

WINNERS / INTERIOR  Revival of plays by Brian Friel and Maurice Maeterlinck respectively

Young Vic

27 May

3 Jun

708

YELLOWMAN New play by Dael Orlandersmith

Hampstead

26 May

19 Jun

696

Regions

   

CANDIDA  Revival of play by George Bernard Shaw

Exeter, Northcott

20 May

29 May

729

COMING AROUND AGAIN  New play by Andrew G Marshall

Leeds, WYP Courtyard

21 May

5 Jun

731

FEN/FAR AWAY  Revival of two plays by Caryl Churchill

Sheffield, Crucible

2 Jun

19 Jun

731

HUDDERSFIELD  New play by Uglijesa Sajtinac, transl. Duska Radosavljevic, English version Chris Thorpe

Leeds, WYP Courtyard

20 May

5 June

730

MA RAINEY'S BLACK BOTTOM  Revival of the play by August Wilson

Liverpool Playhouse

2 Jun

19 Jun

732

A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM  Revival of play by Shakespeare

Chichester Festival

20 May

23 Sep

726

NORTHANGER ABBEY  Adapted by Tim Luscombe from the novel by Jane Austen

York, Theatre Royal

26 May

12 Jun

730

OUT OF THIS WORLD  Revival of Cole Porter musical; book by Dwight Taylor, Reginald Lawrence et al.

Chichester Festival

20 May

25 Sep

725

THE VENETIAN TWINS  Revival of the play by Carlo Goldoni, translated by Ranjit Bolt

Newbury, Watermill

31 May

10 Jul

733

Back to top